Filed under Entertainment

“Popular” Oscars category sparks debate among movie fans

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.

Email This Story

Every February, Hollywood’s brightest stars gather to acknowledge the greatest accomplishments in film over the past year. The Oscars, arguably one of the world’s most prestigious awards ceremonies, are a celebration of the art form of film – often rewarding movies that touch on profoundly deep subjects or tell important, moving stories. This year, however, there will be one notable difference, the Academy of Arts and Science’s board of governors announced (among other things) that the Oscars would now be including a “popular” film category.

For years, fans of the massively popular Marvel Cinematic Universe have lamented that movies like Iron Man and The Avengers are almost always overlooked at the academy awards. Yes, they tend to get nominations in smaller fields like “Sound Editing” or “Production Design”, but the most sought-after award (best picture) very rarely goes to a hugely successful action flicks. Fans have argued that the academy seems to hold some sort of bias against action or superhero movies. So when the Academy announced that they would be adding a category to address this problem, one would assume that fans would be pleased. Right? Wrong.

Almost immediately, the announced sparked mass conversation and controversy. Articles with titles like “The Oscars’ patronizing new Best Popular Film award undermines its very existence” began to pop up quickly, with many movie fans taking to social media to express their issues with the new category. But is this addition cause for such a massive upset? Why are people so angry?

A large part of why people are so angry could be attributed to the fact that the addition of a category based solely on popularity destroys the sanctity of the Oscars. The entire purpose of the Academy Awards is to acknowledge the films that tell important and timely stories – ones that leave the viewer feeling they have learned something, or grown in some type of way. By nature, these films don’t do exceptionally well at the box office. This is why the Oscars are so important – they encourage filmmakers to pursue subjects that won’t make the studio a lot of
money. Instead, the prestigious award acts as a stand-in for millions of dollars in revenue.

On the flip side, box-office hits seem to be made for the sole purpose of generating money for the studios – often replacing nuance and depth with massive action sequences and exotic locations. Many upset movie fans argue, “why should the Oscars suddenly be acknowledging movies that are already generating billions of dollars? Isn’t that enough praise?”

Most importantly, won’t that discourage filmmakers from pursuing deeper and more meaningful films? The answer seems to be yes, but I also believe that this could be a change for the better.

While it’s generally true that most blockbuster action movies lack emotional depth, that doesn’t mean all of them do. Standout films like The Dark Knight and Mad Max: Fury Road somehow managed to strike the perfect balance. While both were incredibly successful at the box office, they also touched on deeper, more nuanced themes, focusing on larger societal issues. I am of the firm belief that if studios follow the example set by stellar films such as Mad Max: Fury Road, the Oscars wouldn’t have to add a category for “popular” movies. Instead, action movies would be proactively adding depth to their stories in an attempt to win big at the Oscars. Until that point is reached, we can only hope that this new category encourages studios to consider not just the monetary impact of their movies, but the emotional one as well.

About the Contributors
Lauren Coates, Headlines Reporter

Lauren Coates is a senior and a first year headlines reporter for Metea Media. She loves all things pop culture, including music, TV, movies, and celebrity drama. She’s a member of Youth and Government and English Honor Society, and when she’s not working or writing for Metea Media, she enjoys watching RIP Vine compilations and talking about reality TV on Twitter (@greenlake88).

Kennedy Homan, Graphics Editor

Kennedy Homan is a person of many different problems. She likes ducks too much, she throws stuffed animals at people in school, and she has no social life due to drawing too much. Her haircut might as well be copyrighted due to it never changing, and her sense of fashion is wearing black capri every day of school no matter the weather. She strives to do graphic novels, but she isn’t a creative writer, so her future is semi-planned out.


4 Responses to ““Popular” Oscars category sparks debate among movie fans”

  1. Mason on September 6th, 2018 8:54 am

    I watch a movie show on YouTube. The host (who I usually agree with) completely hated the popular award. I was conflicted at first but now I’m okay with it. The Oscars exist as a means to honor achievement in film. I believe that achieving mass popularity is a difficult feat (the film industry is very competitive). So I think it’s fine if the Academy want to acknowledge those films.

  2. darkstripe on September 7th, 2018 8:44 am

    i think that making a movie with a large, loving audience is honestly an achievement, and i’m totally fine with a popular movie category. the oscars are for achievements in cinema (even if they are and can be rigged).
    however, superhero movies are beginning to tire on me. it’d be really nice for a new genre to emerge, something new would be nice now that superhero movies have been popular for over a decade.

  3. Mason on September 7th, 2018 1:41 pm

    Eh I wouldn’t worry about it. Western films used to be one of the most profitable genres in film. How many westerns do you see a year now? People will be tired of them eventually.

  4. Me on September 10th, 2018 7:13 am

    Well, the thing is that the Oscars are already based largely off of popularity. Take for example this year, Shape of Water won best picture. The movie proved to be very popular, bringing in $195.2 Million in the box office. Sure, not Marvel numbers, but still proves that the committee still chooses movies that will be somewhat well known. But still, I think a category based purely on popularity is a bad idea.

Thank you for adding your voice to the conversation. Please note that all comments are moderated. Metea Media will not publish comments if they contain the following:

▸ Rude or obscene language (i.e. swear words, sexual jokes, violent threats, etc.)
▸ Hate speech (i.e. racism, sexism, homophobia, etc.)
▸ Insults towards a specific student or a teacher
▸ Content that is irrelevant to the article or does not add to the discussion
▸ Submitting comments under somebody else's name

Refer to the student handbook for further specifics on what is considered appropriate.

The Social Media Editor will read and evaluate all comments. Should there be any issues with a particular comment, the Social Media Editor will consult the newspaper adviser and Online Editor-in-Chief.

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.

Navigate Right
Navigate Left
  • “Popular” Oscars category sparks debate among movie fans


    Your choices do not matter in Deltarune

  • “Popular” Oscars category sparks debate among movie fans


    ‘Bohemian Rhapsody’ is a somewhat weak but ultimately moving tribute to a culture-defining star

  • “Popular” Oscars category sparks debate among movie fans


    Local Halloween pastimes provide students with entertainment

  • “Popular” Oscars category sparks debate among movie fans


    ‘Halloween’ is a flawed but enjoyable return to the legacy of Michael Myers

  • “Popular” Oscars category sparks debate among movie fans


    Stampede Staff Playlist: October Edition

  • “Popular” Oscars category sparks debate among movie fans

    Ben's Guide to Musical Theater

    Ben’s Guide to Musical Theater: Bare A Pop Opera

  • “Popular” Oscars category sparks debate among movie fans


    ‘The Hate U Give’ opens eyes to POC struggles and leaves a meaningful impact

  • “Popular” Oscars category sparks debate among movie fans


    Impressive performances can’t save ‘The Sisters Brothers’ from tonally confused mediocrity

  • “Popular” Oscars category sparks debate among movie fans


    ‘Bad Times at the El Royale’ is a suspenseful mystery with a killer ensemble cast

  • “Popular” Oscars category sparks debate among movie fans


    Super Mario Party brings the franchise back to the golden age

Your World. Your Stories. Every Day.
“Popular” Oscars category sparks debate among movie fans