Movie Review with Brandon Yechout – Ready Player One

Kainin Blissett

Kainin Blissett

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.

Email This Story

In film, the idea of an “auteur” refers to the singular, controlling mind behind a film; a person whose influence over a film’s production is so significant that they are considered the “author” of the film. This term is most often used to refer to directors; some American auteurs, for instance, might be such directors as Welles, Hitchcock, or Kubrick. It is ironic, then, considering that Steven Spielberg is arguably the most well-known director in the United States, that his newest film, entitled “Ready Player One,” felt to me like it might as well have been directed by almost anyone. Although there was a fair amount to enjoy, it is easily my least favorite of all of Spielberg’s films that I’ve seen. I’m not sure it would be entirely fair, however, to attribute the blame for a lot of this to Spielberg. I’ll elaborate shortly.

The film centers around Wade Watts, a teenager who resides in the gloomy future of 2045, where most of the Earth’s population has retreated to the OASIS in order to escape the decrepit and unappealing reality that has overtaken their world. The OASIS, a massive virtual world, is home to all manner of different characters and icons from pop culture, and people who inhabit it are able to become whoever they’d like to be. When Wade, under the moniker of Parzival, obtains the first of three keys that will grant the collector of all three total control over the OASIS, a frantic race is set in motion as various parties vie for the remaining two keys, and ultimately, control over the future of the OASIS (and, in turn, the world).

With these reviews, I typically preface the bad with the good, but I’ll be shifting things around a bit this time because there’s one thing that I simply must address before I go any further, as it was the biggest barrier that I faced while trying to enjoy the film. Indeed, it is a barrier I knew I would have to face since the film’s production was announced, and it is likely something that bothered me more than it bothered anybody else in the theater. Though it was difficult for me to remain wholly objective in the face of this personal bias, I feel that I’m also able to make a compelling case for its detrimental effect on the film. So please, bear with me for a moment.

I am terribly sick of anything themed after “80s nostalgia” or “parodying the 80s” or anything else of that sort. So terribly sick of it. Sick of all of it, and I have been for some time. There exist very few jokes worth making within the whole sphere of “80s parody,” and they have all been long expended. All we’ve gotten since is the same old, same old; retreading over ground so already trod upon that it’s been eroded to dust. As far as playing to nostalgia goes, I see nothing wrong with it in moderation, but when it casts a shadow over the entirety of the work it’s present it, like it does here, it becomes incredibly apparent how hollow it is as a substitute for real substance. It feels like it’s there to distract from something, and often times it is, whether it’s done intentionally or not. In the case of “Ready Player One,” it feels as if it’s all meant to distract from the film’s atrocious lack of consistency with its own rules. I’ll expand upon that line of thought later.

Moreover, I also think that this film’s obsession with making references to pop culture is distracting, intrusive, and ultimately soulless. There’s irony here as well; if a virtual world like the OASIS did actually exist, you would absolutely have people running around as Tracer, Master Chief, and other such characters. My problem with this is that the film constantly draws attention to this; there’s a scene, for instance, wherein the main character waltzes into his best friend’s workshop, takes note of a colossal replica Iron Giant, and proceeds to go through a bin of pop culture spaceships (making sure to hold up and name each one as he rummages through the bin). The film did little for me visually, looking little more than passable most of the time. It’s technically impressive, but its lack of a standout aesthetic made that all moot, in my mind. None of the characters were all too interesting either (with the exception of T.J. Miller’s surprisingly funny character of “i-R0k”), and the film’s mind-numbingly contrived “romance” only drapes over the film another layer of insipidity.

Now, back to that statement I made earlier having to do with the film “not following its own rules.” I’d say it’s pretty self-explanatory, in all honesty, but I’ll list a couple of the places where I found this film to be especially careless in this regard. The entire ruleset of how characters interact with its virtual reality world, for example, seems to be in a state of constant metamorphosis. The main character is able to manipulate his virtual avatar by means of a headset, an omnidirectional treadmill, and I believe he had some controllers as well. Alright, that’s fair. But wait a minute, because we’re later shown people running and jumping around in their houses while they have headsets on; a lady is shown jumping over her couch, for instance, and we see that this movement appeared to her to be a vault over a mound of rock in the virtual world. How exactly did that movement register in the OASIS? We are again later shown a crowd of people in the streets standing in one position, but flailing their arms around as they engage in an epic virtual battle. How does any of this register as movement in the virtual world? Some of them don’t even have controllers, only headsets, and yet they’re moving around as if the movements of their body are somehow affecting their virtual avatar. And wait, the main antagonist’s virtual reality rig is just a gargantuan, spherical throne? And he just sits in it and is sent to the virtual world? How does he even control anything? The rules of the OASIS are just as unstable. People produce weapons and other items from nothing, and yet one of the characters needs to shrink down her vehicle to carry it with her, as if it physically needs to be carried on her person. I could easily keep going, but I’ll stop myself here.

Now why, exactly, is this a problem? Well, it depends on the film. If we’re talking something like “Eraserhead” or even “The Blood of a Poet,” then sure, it’s not a problem that those films aren’t consistent with their own rules because those films have no rules. The atmosphere of “Eraserhead” is reminiscent of some sort of twisted, surreal nightmare. That’s not a film where something like this would be important. In the case of “Ready Player One,” which is trying to invest us in and get us to enjoy its story and world, how are we meant to invest ourselves in a world that seems as if its simply doing whatever it wants without purpose? A world that disregards the clarification of important plot elements? How is its story meant to have any amount of gravity when this is the case?

I had planned on eventually getting to the good, but I feel that I’ve said enough. It was somewhat enjoyable, but I really cannot recommend it considering its many faults. What’s unfortunate about this film, really, is that it was ever created in the first place. Why, of all potential book-to-film adaptations that have yet to be explored, would Spielberg choose to adapt something like this? I would be willing to bet a fair sum that the majority of the film’s problems could be traced back to its source material over Spielberg’s direction. Hopefully he’ll be bouncing back from this misstep soon. Brando’s rating? Two out of four stars.

About the Writer
Brandon Yechout, Perspectives Reporter

Brandon Yechout is a senior at Metea Valley and a perspectives writer for Metea Media. Though this is his first year on staff, Brandon has worked on The Mane in previous years. Brandon enjoys watching a variety of films, mostly classics. His favorite director and actor is Orson Welles.


6 Responses to “Movie Review with Brandon Yechout – Ready Player One”

  1. A Concerned Reader on April 8th, 2018 3:23 pm

    To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand the references. They are extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of 80’s culture most of the jokes will go over a typical viewer’s head. There’s also Wade’s nihilistic outlook, which is deftly woven into his characterization – his personal philosophy draws from Narodnaya Volya literature, for instance. The fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these jokes, to realise that they’re not just funny- they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike Ready Player One truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn’t appreciate, for instance, the humour in Wade’s reference to “Iron Giant” which itself is a cryptic reference to Turgenev’s Russian epic Fathers and Sons. I’m smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as Steven Spielberg’s genius wit unfolds itself on the movie screen. What fools.. how I pity them.

  2. HYUUUP on April 9th, 2018 9:51 am

    As someone who understands one out of every 37 Rick and Morty jokes, I would consider myself quite the intellectual on the topic of humor and an intriguing philosophical outlook on life that Ready Player One gives. Thank you my good sir, as I thought that I was the only one who understood the hidden dark romantic archaic language burrowed in the plot. As a result, only true intellectuals can truly grasp the social constructs that are presented in this particular movie.

  3. Beco on April 9th, 2018 8:23 am

    I don’t know, something about this review just is not clicking. I must agree that perhaps Spielberg was not the right person to take on the task of this movie, but one does not usually think solely on this one fact throughout the movie. I can not speak on the behalf of the true movie and gaming fans who went to see the movie in hopes of witnessing Easter eggs within the movie and catching glimpses of their favorite characters aided with jokes referencing things a true member of the gaming and/or movie community would understand, as the fellow before me stated. Although I can speak for the number of people who went to witness an amazing concept of virtual reality and a rather interesting movie without any background and probably only being able to spot a few characters they actually knew. Now I gave gaming a try growing up with guys, but have left it behind so I can not say I consider myself a part of the community; but as a regular audience member I must say this movie was awesome! Yes I agree that the added romance was simply glossed over as if it needed to be added , but I appreciate that because at least Spielberg kept it more about the action and not so much about a typical love story ,which, in the end is just what Spielberg is all about – action. I really appreciated the idea of them being able to do whatever they wanted because that is what OASIS was always about. I do agree that their are plenty of inconsistencies , but the general audience left with a lively idea of virtual reality.

  4. fortine is mi life on April 9th, 2018 8:32 am

    i liked te movie but there were not fortine referencs

  5. A Strong Brandon Fan on April 26th, 2018 7:37 am

    How can I get the full Yechout experience without seeing Brandon himself. As a farewell senior episode he should come back.

  6. The Diddler on May 9th, 2018 7:59 am

    Good movie, but not as great as “The Lockerbanks” on youtube.

Thank you for adding your voice to the conversation. Please note that all comments are moderated. Metea Media will not publish comments if they contain the following:

▸ Rude or obscene language (i.e. swear words, sexual jokes, violent threats, etc.)
▸ Hate speech (i.e. racism, sexism, homophobia, etc.)
▸ Insults towards a specific student or a teacher
▸ Content that is irrelevant to the article or does not add to the discussion
▸ Submitting comments under somebody else's name

Refer to the student handbook for further specifics on what is considered appropriate.

The Social Media Editor will read and evaluate all comments. Should there be any issues with a particular comment, the Social Media Editor will consult the newspaper adviser and Online Editor-in-Chief.

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.

Navigate Right
Navigate Left
  • Movie Review with Brandon Yechout – Ready Player One


    ‘Bad Times at the El Royale’ is a suspenseful mystery with a killer ensemble cast

  • Movie Review with Brandon Yechout – Ready Player One


    Super Mario Party brings the franchise back to the golden age

  • Movie Review with Brandon Yechout – Ready Player One


    ‘Venom’ is a rocky but promising start for Sony’s universe of Marvel characters

  • Movie Review with Brandon Yechout – Ready Player One


    “Night School” is a disjointed comedy with a surprising amount of heart

  • Movie Review with Brandon Yechout – Ready Player One


    ‘Anthony Bourdain: Parts Unknown’ starts host’s posthumous season

  • Movie Review with Brandon Yechout – Ready Player One


    Olivia Munn leads a promising but forgettable cast of bumbling misfits in ‘The Predator’

  • Movie Review with Brandon Yechout – Ready Player One


    I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream Analysis

  • Movie Review with Brandon Yechout – Ready Player One


    Anna Kendrick shines in stylish but overcomplicated thriller

  • Movie Review with Brandon Yechout – Ready Player One

    Staff Playlist

    Stampede Staff Playlist: September Edition

  • Movie Review with Brandon Yechout – Ready Player One

    Ben's Guide to Musical Theater

    Ben’s Guide to Musical Theater: Come From Away

Your World. Your Stories. Every Day.
Movie Review with Brandon Yechout – Ready Player One