One thing that has become increasingly relevant in the past 20 years is safety and security, especially within our schools. Schools across the country are implementing new procedures to combat issues that threaten the integrity of education. From something as simple as AI to as horrible as mass shootings, maintaining a safe and fair environment in our schools is important.
But when do these rules become overbearing? When do rules blur the line between safety to invasion of privacy? Or when do they simply get annoying?
Recently, the school has started implementing new security systems through a student safety company called Securly. It’s a system that doesn’t do anything but make things more complicated.
Securly Pass is a digital hall monitoring pass system through Securly. Instead of your teacher writing you a pass, you “clock out” to go do whatever you need to do, and “clock back in” when returning. This, with all due respect, is foolish. Paper passes have worked for years, so why do they not now?. You also need to “clock in” when going to the library during lunch/access, and you can only use one hallway; that’s just dumb. We are also asked to flex our IDs constantly; at that point, just give us lanyards.
Securly Flex is a software-as-a-service tool through Securly. It overhauled the entire old Mustang 30 system, which didn’t have any problems to begin with, so why change it?
Securly also has a classroom monitoring system, and don’t even get me started about that. I understand that watching our screen prevents cheating and goofing off, but it’s just an invasion of privacy. It also blocks new tabs except Google Drive and Google Classroom. So I can access my Google Docs, but I can’t check my Email? Make it make sense! Also, playing games on your Chromebook isn’t always that bad, especially for students who get their work done.
And now onto the phone pockets. Never before have I seen something more controversial than the phone pockets. Phones are a problem in school, and the pockets prevent cheating and goofing around. But it’s so much easier to have phones in a backpack than in a pocket. Not only are phones at risk of being stolen, but if an incident were to occur within the school, how else would our parents be contacted, an Email after the fact?
I get that safety is a major concern, especially after the shooting that happened two weeks ago in Minneapolis. But there are easier ways to prevent tragedies than just making student life complicated.
How about instead of having multiple checkpoints around the school, put checkpoints at the entrances/exits? An incident can’t occur if a threat can’t even get in. Metal detectors are also a great way to prevent students from bringing weapons into the school. And finally, to prevent cheating/goofing off during work time, have the teacher walk around the room and check if students’ assignments are done.
All of this extra security is getting excessive and wasting valuable time that could be used for other things.
Editors Note: This story was edited after it was published to clarify the difference between Securly Flex, Securly Pass and Securly Classroom.
Rosalie Pecoraro • Sep 17, 2025 at 1:11 pm
I completely agree with this; the old systems didn’t need an update and work just fine. Securlypass is so embarrassing cause it shows the whole class how long you’re in the bathroom for, UNNECESSARY
Ezequiel Martinez • Sep 10, 2025 at 2:29 pm
Thank you for writing this! Many people are upset with securly pass, including my family and I. Securly pass does nothing but shame kids by telling their classmates how long they’ve been in the bathroom. There are so many problems with this, including the fact that it’s making children tell their teachers all their medical business. What if a girl starts her period and has to go to the nurse? She would get flagged for being gone too long, and this isn’t fair. I agree. The paper pass system is so much better.
I. S. • Sep 10, 2025 at 1:19 pm
Great article! I noticed your use of Concession and Rebuttal which definitely made you look way more credible and enhanced your explanation for why the school was DTM!! Your solutions are somewhat ignorant though, as adding checkpoints and metal detectors would look bad for the district, so in a case like this, you should factor in all related parties, not just the students. I would’ve also loved to see you bring up a cybersecurity point in terms of data breaching and insecure storage, as the switch to digital tracking from analog passes may cause concerns regarding data security and digital privacy.
Moreover, I enjoyed your usage of pathos and how you employed specific diction (like “foolish,” “overbearing,” “annoying,” “dumb,” and “excessive”) to evoke negative feelings about the new policies and software. A fear-based approach to the phone pockets was a great idea! It’s a powerful emotional appeal to students and parents, and the usage of irony solidified your point by highlighting how silly alternative solutions might sound.
Of course, your usage of logos is also impeccable. A cause-and-effect explanation as to why the policies are ineffective is great. And, tying back to the usage of irony, the logical fallacy you used regarding Gmail and the implementation of the new Securly Classroom software is impressive. Finally, using past success to argue from precedent is an effective tactic.
Keep up the great work!