With the second semester being right around the corner, freshmen are excited about the end of What I Need TIME. Some people saw this as a waste of time, while others used this given time as a tool for studying and doing homework. Some questions that arise are why is WIN not more strictly monitored for work, and is it even necessary?
WIN is a nationwide program that was created as a breakaway from constant learning to focus on yourself. It was made to support students who may not have enough time or space to focus on their work outside of school. WIN is a great time to both do your homework and study for tests, because there is always a teacher present who can help you. However, some students use this time for other purposes, such as relaxing or socializing with friends.
WIN is not a class that is monitored too strictly. While some teachers do not allow phones in class, some do, and some other restrictions, usually present in other classes, are lifted. While this may seem like a detriment to productivity during this time, it may help some students. Social activity and interaction are a key part of every adult’s and teen’s life, because some people relax or develop valuable life skills through talking to people. WIN stands for “What I Need Time,” and sometimes all people need is to unwind and relax from all of the work that they deal with in their day-to-day lives.
Some people argue that WIN is just a waste of their time and is unnecessary, but is this true? A significant number of students believe that the school taking half of their lunch on 2 out of the 5 days for WIN is a waste of time. While WIN does give people quiet time to work which is by all means beneficial, some people want to work with their friends who may not be in their class. WIN gives students a more efficient environment for work; however it limits the people that are around you, occasionally decreasing efficiency for some.
In conclusion, “What I Need” time is a great addition to the standard curriculum, as it gives people time to work or unwind from their previous classes. While it does hinder the socializing aspect and the available work partners, it boosts efficiency with a quiet environment and gives you a reliable source of help, such as teachers.
Despite everything, one question remains: should WIN be introduced at all grade levels, and should it be up to the student or counselors to decide?
▸ Rude or obscene language (i.e. swear words, sexual jokes, violent threats, etc.)
▸ Hate speech (i.e. racism, sexism, homophobia, etc.)
▸ Insults towards a specific student or a teacher
▸ Content that is irrelevant to the article or does not add to the discussion
▸ Submitting comments under somebody else's name
Refer to the student handbook for further specifics on what is considered appropriate.
The Social Media Editor will read and evaluate all comments. Should there be any issues with a particular comment, the Social Media Editor will consult the newspaper adviser and Online Editor-in-Chief.